Other Statutes Cases filed in California
Cases 1 - 10 of 48
In Re Glumetza Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv05822
Defendant: Lupin Ltd., Bausch Health Companies Inc., Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Meijer, Inc., Meijer Distribution, Inc., KPH Healthcare Services, Inc. and others
Petitioner: Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp., Rite Aid Corporation, Hy-Vee, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., Cardinal Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 Antitrust Litigation
Board of Trustees of the Tile Industry Health and Welfare Fund v. California Granite and Flooring, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv03589
Defendant: Carlos Arizmendi and California Granite and Flooring, Inc.
Plaintiff: Board of Trustees of the Tile Industry Health and Welfare Fund
Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust, et al v. Young and Associates
as 2:2018cv03386
Plaintiff: Contract Administration Fund, Engineers Contract Compliance Committee Fund, Fund for Construction Industry Advancement and others
Defendant: Young and Associates
Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust et al v. Nor-Cal Pipeline Services
as 2:2018cv02931
Plaintiff: Contract Administration Fund, Engineers Contract Compliance Committee Fund, Fund for Construction Industry Advancement and others
Unknown: Matthew T Bechtel, Matthew T Bechtel, Matthew T Bechtel and others
Defendant: Nor-Cal Pipeline Services
Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust et al v. McKenna General Engineering, Inc.
as 5:2018cv00664
Plaintiff: Contract Administration Fund, Engineers Contract Compliance Committee Fund, Southern California Partnership for Jobs Fund and others
Defendant: McKenna General Engineering, Inc.
Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust et al v. Consolidated Street Sweeping, Inc.
as 5:2018cv00159
Defendant: Consolidated Street Sweeping, Inc.
Plaintiff: Contract Administration Fund, Engineers Contract Compliance Committee Fund, Fund for Construction Industry Advancement and others
Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust et al v. Koch-Armstrong General Engineering, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00425
Plaintiff: Engineers Contract Compliance Committee Fund, Fund for Construction Industry Advancement, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund and others
Defendant: Koch-Armstrong General Engineering, Inc.
The Board of Trustees of the Southern California Glaziers Architechtural Metal and Glass Workers et al v. All American Automatic Door Services, Inc et al
as 2:2017cv08875
Defendant: All American Automatic Door Services, Inc. and Does
Unknown: David E Dukes
Plaintiff: The Boards of Trustee of the Southern California Glaziers, Architechtural Metal and Glass Workers Health and Welfare Fund, The Boards of Trustees of the Finishing Trades Institute of District Council 36 Joint Apprenticeship Training Trust Fund, The Boards of Trustees of the Glaziers Architechtural Metal and Glass Workers Local Union No. 636 and others
Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust et al v. Coleman Construction, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv08170
Defendant: Coleman Construction, Inc.
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Training Trust and others
Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust et al v. Nova Testing and Inspection Services, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv08098
Defendant: Advanced NDT Solutions, LLC and Nova Testing and Inspection Services, LLC
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Training Trust and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?