Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Hammond City of et al v. ASARCO Master Inc
as 2:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
City of Hammond, Indiana, City of Whiting, Indiana, Hammond City of and others
Defendant:
ASARCO MASTER, INC. and ASARCO Master Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6972 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
City of Hammond et al v. Lake County Judicial Nominating Commission
as 2:2021cv00160
Plaintiff:
City of Hammond, Eduardo Fontanez, Thomas McDermott and others
Defendant:
Lake County Judicial Nominating Commission
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02418
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00791
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
City of Hammond v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 2:2017cv00431
Plaintiff:
City of Hammond
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L P , Purdue Pharma Inc , The Purdue Frederick Company Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States America et al v. Sanitary District of Hammond The
as 2:2017cv00048
Plaintiff:
United States America and State of Indiana
Defendant:
Sanitary District of Hammond The
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Regan et al v. Hammond Indiana City of
as 2:2016cv00098
Plaintiff:
Christopher Regan and Northwest Indiana Creative Investors Association Inc
Defendant:
Hammond Indiana City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
