Cases 1 - 9 of 9
In Re: Harlon L. Dalton
as 1:2013mc00857
Respondent:
Harlon L. Dalton
Cause Of Action: Disciplinary Proceedings
National Org For Marriage Inc. v. Jorge Cruz-Bustillo, et al
as 11-14193
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MARRIAGE INC
Defendant - Appellee:
JORGE L. CRUZ-BUSTILLO, In his official capacity as chair of the Florida Elections Commission, WILLIAM HARLON HOLLIMON, ALIA FARAJ-JOHNSON and others
:
SERVICE
Nat'l Org. For Marriage v. Jorge Cruz-Bustillo, et al
as 10-15295
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MARRIAGE INC
Defendant - Appellee:
JORGE L. CRUZ-BUSTILLO, in his official capacity as Chair of the Florida Elections Commission, WILLIAM HARLON HOLLIMON, in their official capacity as member of the Florida Elections Commission, LEON JACOBS, JR., in their official capacity as member of the Florida Elections Commission and others
Harlon W. Blankenship v. Owens-corning Fiberglas Corporat, et al.
as PAE/2:10-CV-60942
Plaintiff:
Harlon W. Blankenship
Defendant:
Owens-corning Fiberglas Corporat
Harlon Blansett v. Tyco International (u.s.) Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-77498
Defendant:
Tyco International (u.s.) Inc
Plaintiff:
Harlon Blansett
USA v. Harlon Jordan
as 08-10205
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
HARLON B. JORDAN
Harley Mailoa, et al v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
as 08-70886
Petitioner:
HARLEY EDMOND MAILOA, LINCE ROHANI PURBA, CEISCRAD HARLON UCOK and others
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Cauthron v. United States of America et al
as 3:2007cv08110
Plaintiff:
Harlon E Cauthron
Defendant:
United States of America, Medicare, Medicaid Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Cauthron v. United States of America et al
as 2:2007cv02058
Plaintiff:
Harlon E Cauthron
Defendant:
United States of America, Medicare, Medicaid Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
