Other Statutes Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 26
HARPER
as 2:2023mc00055
AV2 v. MCDONOUGH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00369
Plaintiff: AV2
Defendant: DENIS RICHARD MCDONOUGH, MONIQUE SMART, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
CICCOTELLI v. IKONICS CORP et al
as 2:2021cv04391
Plaintiff: ALEX CICCOTELLI
Defendant: IKONICS CORP, BILL ULLAND, GLENN SANDGREN and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
CICCOTELLI v. LYDALL INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03784
Plaintiff: ALEX CICCOTELLI
Defendant: LYDALL INC., MARC T. GILES, SARA A GREENSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
JOHNSON v. HARPER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00883
Plaintiff: ASIA JOHNSON
Defendant: ORLANDO HARPER, OFFICER BENJAMIN, DR. MARTONE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BALANCED BRIDGE FUNDING, LLC v. HARPER
as 2:2020cv06525
Petitioner: BALANCED BRIDGE FUNDING, LLC
Respondent: ALVIN C HARPER
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01663
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
PERRONG v. HBW LEADS LLC et al
as 2:2017cv05442
Plaintiff: ANDREW R. PERRONG
Defendant: HBW LEADS LLC, JEREMY WINN, NATHAN HARPER and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
BANKS v. MERIT SYSTEM PROTECTION BOARD US DEPT OF JUSTICE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016mc00061
Petitioner: FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent: MERIT SYSTEM PROTECTION BOARD US DEPT OF JUSTICE, DAVID HICTON, ROBERT CESSAR and others
BANKS v. WIETZMAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016mc00058
Plaintiff: FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant: MARK G. WIETZMAN, DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, MERIT SYSTEM PROTECTION BOARD US DEPT OF JUSTICE and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?