Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Law Student Appearances
as 3:2018mc09006
In Re:
Gary Brown, Jr., Allen C. Chan, Danielle DeCant and others
Adams et al v. Bruhn et al
as 3:2013cv01027
Plaintiff:
Action Equipment Company, Inc., William Besley Adams, Jr., Ali Al-Abbas and others
Defendant:
Lyman J. Bruhn, Sheila Bruhn, Yusaf Jawed and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Holmes et al
as 2:2012cv00535
Defendant:
Robert Dean Holmes and RDH Entertainment, LLC
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Unauthorized Publication or use of Communications
DIRECTV, Inc. v. Holmes et al
as 2:2011cv01369
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, Inc.
Defendant:
Robert Dean Holmes and RDH Entertainment LLC
Cause Of Action: Unauthorized Publication or use of Communications
Holmes v. American Red Ball Transit Company, Inc.
as 3:2010cv01517
Defendant:
American Red Ball Transit Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Aimee Holmes
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706 Interstate Transportation - Carmack Amendment
Encompass Teleservices, Inc. v. Scheets
as 3:2004cv00821
:
Added: 08/24/2006 and Added: 08/24/2006
Counter Defendant:
Michael A. Boyle, Patrick Boyle, John L Cargal and others
Interested Party:
Adam Clark and Thomas M. Renn
Plaintiff:
Encompass Teleservices, Inc.
Intervenor:
Holmes and W. Holmes & Co., LLP
Counter Claimant:
Randall Lee Scheets
Defendant:
Randall Lee Scheets
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Merrihew et al v. MML Investor Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv01223
Defendant:
American Express Financial Advisors, Inc., Umpqua Bank, David P. Grau and others
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Carney, Mary Denson, Edward Reinstein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
