Cases 1 - 9 of 9
(PS) Herships v. CA Sup Ct County of Yolo
as 2:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
Howard Herships
Defendant:
California Superior Court County of Yolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PS) Fletcher et al v. Baghri Hotels Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01444
Plaintiff:
Karen Fletcher and Howard Herships
Defendant:
Baghri Hotels Inc., Sunita Kapoor and Wyndham Hotels and Resorts Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
FLETCHER et al v. BAGHRI HOTELS INC et al
as 3:2023cv03411
Plaintiff:
Karen Fletcher and Howard Herships
Defendant:
BAGHRI HOTELS INC, SUNITA KAPOOR and WYNDHAM HOTELS AND RESORTS INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
FLETCHER et al v. BAGHRI HOTELS INC et al
as 2:2023cv01714
Plaintiff:
KAREN FLETCHER and HOWARD HERSHIPS
Defendant:
BAGHRI HOTELS INC, SUNITA KAPOOR, WYNDHAM HOTELS AND RESORTS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Brian Chavez, et al v. County of Santa Clara
as 21-16491
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BRIAN CHAVEZ and BRANDON BRACAMONTE
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
Petitioner / Appellant:
HOWARD HERSHIPS, Proposed Intervenor
Howard Herships v. USDC-CASF
as 21-71187
Not Classified By Court:
In re: HOWARD HERSHIPS, SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CLASS COUNSELS and others
Petitioner:
HOWARD HERSHIPS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Herships v. State of California, et al
as 2:2014cv00089
Plaintiff:
Howard Herships
Defendant:
State of California and Edmund G. Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Howard Herships v. USDC, San Francisco, et al
as 12-71496
:
In re: HOWARD HERSHIPS
Petitioner:
HOWARD HERSHIPS
Respondent:
USDC, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Howard Herships v. USDCSF
as 10-71764
:
In re: HOWARD HERSHIPS
Petitioner:
HOWARD HERSHIPS
Respondent:
USDC, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
