Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GALLAGHER v. OCULAR THERAPEUTIX, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv12288
Plaintiff:
THOMAS GALLAGHER
Defendant:
OCULAR THERAPEUTIX, INC. , AMARPREET SAWHNEY , ANDREW HURLEY and others
Movant:
Khaled Ramadan , Ocular Therapeutix Investor Group , Osi Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
KIM v. OCULAR THERAPEUTIX, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv12286
Defendant:
OCULAR THERAPEUTIX, INC. , AMARPREET SAWHNEY , ANDREW HURLEY and others
Plaintiff:
Shawna Kim
Movant:
Glenn Stephenson , Ocular Investor Group and Osi Peters
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
KIM v. OCULAR THERAPEUTIX, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv12283
Defendant:
OCULAR THERAPEUTIX, INC., AMARPREET SAWHNEY, ANDREW HURLEY and others
Plaintiff:
Shawna Kim
Movant:
Glenn Stephenson, Ocular Investor Group and Osi Peters
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
CARAKER v. OCULAR THERAPEUTIX, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv12146
Plaintiff:
DYLAN CARAKER
Defendant:
OCULAR THERAPEUTIX, INC. , AMARPREET SAWHNEY , George Migausky and others
Movant:
Osi Peters , Glenn Stephenson , Ocular Investor Group and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
In Re Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings
as 1:2017mc91185
Movant:
Robert M. Farrell
Respondent:
Jonathan Hurley
Cause Of Action: Referral from BK Court - Attorney Discipline
Schwesinger et al v. Hurley et al
as 1:2013cv11436
Plaintiff:
Edmund Schwesinger, Jr. and First Daniel Corporation
Defendant:
Jesse Hurley, William Gasko and Seth Voltz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Green Mountain Realty Corp. v. Leonard et al
as 1:2009cv11559
Plaintiff:
Green Mountain Realty Corp.
Defendant:
John S. Leonard, Sara L. Harnish, Virginia M. Donahue King and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332 (c) Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
