Cases 1 - 10 of 312
United Spinal Association, et al. v. State of California, et al.
as 24-2751
Plaintiff:
UNITED SPINAL ASSOCIATION, NOT DEAD YET, INSTITUTE FOR PATIENTS RIGHTS and others
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Governor, ROBERT BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General and others
United Spinal Association, et al. v. State of California, et al.
as 24-2755
Plaintiff:
UNITED SPINAL ASSOCIATION, NOT DEAD YET, INSTITUTE FOR PATIENTS RIGHTS and others
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GAVIN NEWSOM, ROBERT BONTA and others
Other:
COMPASSION & CHOICES ACTION NETWORK, LAMBERT BASSLER, JUDITH COBURN and others
Ayala-Rodriguez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2699
Petitioner:
JESUS ALBERTO AYALA-RODRIGUEZ, INGRID ARELY LAINEZ-DE AYALA, ALEXI ARNOLDO AYALA-LAINEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Davis
as 24-989
Defendant:
DERRILYN NEEDHAM, RONALD KNIBBS, RODERICK GUNN and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Maisonet (Negron Sr.)
as 24-572
Defendant:
GUILLERMO NEGRON, SR., FRANCISCO MAISONET, JOSE MAISONET and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ingrid Domingo-Aguilar v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1599
Petitioner:
Ingrid Domingo-Aguilar
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Watts v. Brito
as 24-451
Plaintiff:
CARLYN WATTS
Defendant:
INGRID BRITO, JOSHUA WALTERS, Attorney, N.Y.C.H.A. SUPERVISOR and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gomez-Cepeda, et al. v. Garland
as 24-262
Petitioner:
CAMILO HERNANDP GOMEZ-CEPEDA, INGRID ESTEFANIA PARRADO-MORENO and JOEL MATIAS GOMEZ-PARRADO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
