Cases 1 - 10 of 34
In re: David Kauffman
as 23-3179
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID R. KAUFFMAN
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, ERIC YOUNG, BORDAS and others
Castel S.A. v. Wilson, et al.
as 23-3554
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CASTEL S.A.
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER A. WILSON
Defendant:
OLIVIA HO CHENG, an individual, ARF PARTNERS, LLC, a Massachusetts limited liability company, STEVEN J. JAMES, an individual and others
Castel S.A. v. Wilson, et al.
as 23-3524
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CASTEL S.A., a Luxeumbourg joint stock company (societe anonyme)
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. WILSON, an individual
Defendant:
OLIVIA HO CHENG, an individual, ARF PARTNERS, LLC, a Massachusetts limited liability company, STEVEN J. JAMES, an individual and others
Lipshutz et al v. Costello et al
as 1:2023cv04058
Plaintiff:
Solomon Lipshutz and Jeweltex Manufacturing Inc. Retirement Plan
Defendant:
Ellen M Costello, Grace E Dailey, Barbara J. Desoer and others
Lipshutz et al v. Costello et al
as 1:2022cv04547
Plaintiff:
Solomon Lipshutz and Jeweltex Manufacturing Inc. Retirement Plan
Defendant:
Ellen M Costello, Grace E Dailey, Barbara J. Desoer and others
Lavond HillIn re: Lavond Hill
as 21-1783
Respondent:
J. JONES, JOHN E. WETZEL, D. CLOSE and others
Petitioner:
In re: LAVOND HILL
Barth v. Mabry Carlton Ranch, Inc et al
as 5:2020cv09288
Defendant:
Longino Ranch, Inc., Mabry Carlton Ranch, Inc, Eric Sutton and others
Plaintiff:
John S Barth and John Barth
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964
Dinsmore v. Ellison et al
as 3:2020cv04602
Defendant:
Safra A. Catz, Vishal Sikka, Bruce R. Chizen and others
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Dinsmore
Klein v. Ellison et al
as 3:2020cv04439
Defendant:
Safra A. Catz, Charles (Wick) Moorman, IV, Vishal Sikka and others
Plaintiff:
R. Andre Klein, Alison Sherman and Kathleen Dinsmore
Courtney James v. Randall Hepp
as 19-3447
Respondent / Appellee:
RANDALL HEPP
Petitioner / Appellant:
COURTNEY J. JAMES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
