Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Burton et al v. Bluefield Realty Group, LLC et al
as 7:2024cv01800
Plaintiff:
Shauntell Burton, Benny D. Cheatham, Robert Douglass and others
Defendant:
Bluefield Realty Group, LLC, Allen Tate Real Estate, LLC, McClendon Realty, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Hawley v. United States Army Fort Jackson Criminal Investigation Division
as 3:2023cv06270
Plaintiff:
Erin Hawley
Defendant:
United States Army Fort Jackson Criminal Investigation Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Doe v. Thrasher et al
as 3:2021cv02748
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Childs Cantey Thrasher, Donald Gist, Brian M. Barnwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv02158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Brett-Andrew: House of Nelson v. Burgemeister et al
as 1:2021cv01292
Petitioner:
Brett-Andrew: House of Nelson
Respondent:
Donald Corwin Jackson, Lori Beth Talbot, Ashley Morgan Burgemeister and others
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv03528
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Adams v. Jackson et al
as 7:2018cv02206
Defendant:
John Does 1-25 and John Lee Jackson
Plaintiff:
Pearl Adams
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Donnelly v. Davis et al
as 8:2018cv00643
Plaintiff:
D J Donnelly
Defendant:
Ben Davis, Linda McDonald, Stephanie Jackson Amell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
