Cases 1 - 8 of 8
ARENA v. EAST LINE LENDING, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01551
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY A. ARENA
Defendant:
EAST LINE LENDING, LLC, JENNIFER PETERS, WOLF RIVER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
KNOTTS v. CRANE LENDING, LLC d/b/a CRANE FINANCE et al
as 1:2022cv01511
Plaintiff:
CAITLIN KNOTTS
Defendant:
CRANE LENDING, LLC d/b/a CRANE FINANCE, JENNIFER PETERS, WOLF RIVER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Morgan v. West Side Lending, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv03674
Plaintiff:
Joseph Morgan
Defendant:
West Side Lending, LLC, Jennifer Peters, Wolf River Development Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kalkbrenner v. West Side Lending, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00420
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kalkbrenner
Defendant:
West Side Lending, LLC, Jennifer Peters, Wolf River Development Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Southwest Fair Housing Council, et al v. Maricopa Domestic Water Improv, et al
as 20-15506
Defendant / Appellee:
PINAL COUNTY and MARICOPA DOMESTIC WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, an Arizona municipal corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAVITA PENA, JENNIFER PETERS and SOUTHWEST FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL, INC., an Arizona nonprofit corporation
Martin et al v. Bank of America N.A. et al
as 1:2013cv02350
Plaintiff:
John Miller, Karen Holloway, Gerald Beamon and others
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., BMO Harris Bank, N.A., OneWest Bank, FSB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re: Harvey Mickelsen, et al
as 13-60016
Debtor:
In re: HARVEY P. MICKELSEN and STEPHANIE B. MICKELSEN
Appellant:
JAMES PATRICK CHANDLER
Appellee:
JAN P. JOHNSON, Chapter 13 Trustee
:
SEAN GJERDE, AUGUST BURDETTE LANDIS, UST - UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Sacramento and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
