Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Carmen John Perri v. E L F Enterprises, Inc et al
as 8:2017cv01877
Defendant:
Does, E L F Enterprises, Inc and Jiffy Lube International, Inc
Plaintiff:
Carmen John Perri
Stevens et al v. Jiffy Lube International, Inc.
as 3:2016cv07175
Petitioner:
Randy Stevens and Elissa Stevens
Respondent:
Jiffy Lube International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Koeller v. Textmarks, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv02045
Petitioner:
Edward Koeller
Respondent:
TextMarks, Inc., Hearland Automotive Services Inc. and Jiffy Lube International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Cushnie v. Heartland Automotive Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01784
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Cushnie
Defendant:
Heartland Automotive Services, Inc. , Jiffy Lube International, Inc. and TextMarks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
IN RE: JIFFY LUBE INTERNATIONAL, INC., TEXT SPAM LITIGATION
as 3:2011md02261
Plaintiff:
Joseph Crowl , Dawn Souder , Tramy Duong and others
Defendant:
Jiffy Lube International, Inc. , Heartland Automotive Services, Inc. and TextMarks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Koeller v. Textmarks, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv02773
Plaintiff:
Edward Koeller
Defendant:
Textmarks, Inc., Hearland Automotive Services Inc. and Jiffy Lube International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Duong v. Jiffy Lube International, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00943
Plaintiff:
Tramy Duong
Defendant:
Jiffy Lube International, Inc. and Heartland Automotive Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Souder v. Jiffy Lube International, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00896
Plaintiff:
Dawn Souder
Defendant:
Jiffy Lube International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Crowl v. Jiffy Lube International, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00865
Plaintiff:
Joseph Crowl
Defendant:
Jiffy Lube International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv03407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
