Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Mikeal Stine v. USDC-AZT
as 22-70015
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MIKEAL GLENN STINE, JEAN LOUIS, Pharmacist, USP/Arizona and K. GARCIA, Trust Fund Supervisor, USP/Tucson, Arizona
Petitioner:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, TUCSON
Michael Seals v. K. Allison, et al
as 20-17432
Defendant / Appellee:
R. DIAZ, D. DAVEY, D. GOREE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL IZELL SEALS
Mikeal Stine v. B. Von Blankensee, et al
as 20-16393
Defendant / Appellee:
ASH, Medical Doctor, USP/Tucson, Arizona, BASS, Health Services Administrator, USP/Tucson, Arizona, SEGAL, Unknown; Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv03226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
In re: Daniel Garcia
as 16-12070
Petitioner:
In re: DANIEL K. GARCIA
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Garcia et al v. DESARROLLADORA DE ILUSIONES, S.A. DE C.V. et al
as 5:2015cv01116
Defendant:
Ronald Scott Brown, Clarion Partners, LLC, James Christian Hendricks and others
Plaintiff:
COMERCIALIZADORA Y CONSTRUCTORA MIGSAL, S.A. DE C.V.,, DESARROLLADORA DE ILUSIONES, S.A. DE C.V., ECON DESARROLLADOR INMOBILIARIO, S.A. DE C.V., and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Garcia et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-16751
Plaintiff:
Rebecca K. Garcia and Rudolfo Garcia
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Garcia v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-12023
Plaintiff:
Rhonda K. Garcia
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and C.R. Bard Inc.
Anaeme et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv02555
Defendant:
Mr Acevado, Y Adiboye, S Afhook and others
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
