Other Statutes Cases filed in Missouri
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Macon Electric Cooperative et al v. Wooldridge et al
as 4:2018cv02048
Plaintiff: G. Phil Saunders, Larry Robuck, Kemper Walker and others
Defendant: George Smith and Kenneth L. Wooldridge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Macon Electric Cooperative et al v. Wooldridge et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00109
Plaintiff: G. Phil Saunders, Larry Robuck, Kemper Walker and others
Defendant: George Smith and Kenneth L. Wooldridge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Kemper et al
as 4:2015cv00764
Plaintiff: Rafael Jones
Defendant: Johnathan Kemper and Commerce Bank and Trust
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2011cv00097
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv01245
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00795
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Type: Other Statutes None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00790
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00791
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00597
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00115
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?