Cases 1 - 9 of 9
THOMAS v. KOHL'S, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02312
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN THOMAS
Defendant:
KOHL'S, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00044
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04365
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
GRESHAM v. KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.
as 4:2017cv00141
Plaintiff:
AARON GRESHAM
Defendant:
KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02809
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
KELLY v. KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.
as 1:2014cv01499
Plaintiff:
SHARLOT KELLY
Defendant:
KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
GILMAN et al v. WALTERS et al
as 3:2012cv00114
Plaintiff:
DALE P. ARMSTRONG, GEORGE W. BELSEY, CHARLES R. BLAKLEY and others
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES I-X, F.E. MORAN OIL COMPANY, MANNON L. WALTERS LLC and others
Interested Party:
MANNON L. WALTERS 2005 A1, LP, MANNON L. WALTERS 2005 A2, LP, MANNON L. WALTERS 2006A, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GILMAN et al v. WALTERS et al
as 1:2012cv00128
Plaintiff:
DALE P. ARMSTRONG, GEORGE W. BELSEY, CHARLES R. BLAKLEY and others
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES I-X, F.E. MORAN OIL COMPANY, MANNON L. WALTERS LLC and others
Interested Party:
MANNON L. WALTERS 2005 A1, LP, MANNON L. WALTERS 2005 A2, LP, MANNON L. WALTERS 2006A, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
