Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Scott v. Cerevel Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott
Defendant:
Cerevel Therapeutics Holdings, Inc., N. Anthony Coles, Ron Renaud and others
Dixon v. Cerevel Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Brian Dixon
Defendant:
Cerevel Therapeutics Holdings, Inc., N. Anthony Coles, Ron Renaud and others
Travers v. Cerevel Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
John Travers
Defendant:
Cerevel Therapeutics Holdings, Inc., Tony Coles, Ron Renaud and others
Richard J Koppel v. Robert Bonta et al
as 8:2023cv00813
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Koppel
Defendant:
Robert Bonta, Don Barnes and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
JUSTICE, II v. DICERNA PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al
as 2:2021cv05340
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY D JUSTICE, II
Defendant:
DICERNA PHARMACEUTICALS INC., DOUGLAS M FAMBROUGH III, J. KEVIN BUCHI and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Whitehead v. Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06764
Plaintiff:
Joann Whitehead
Defendant:
Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Douglas M. Fambrough, III, J. Kevin Buchi and others
Kaufmann v. Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10379
Plaintiff:
David Kaufmann
Defendant:
Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Douglas M. Fambrough, III, J. Kevin Buchi and others
Kent v. Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01716
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Douglas M. Fambrough, III, J. Kevin Buchi and others
Sheridan v. Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03236
Plaintiff:
Joseph Sheridan
Defendant:
Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Douglas M. Fambrough, III, J. Kevin Buchi and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Hopkins v. Dicerna Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10345
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hopkins
Defendant:
Dicerna Pharmaceuticals Inc., Douglas M. Fambrough, III, J. Kevin Buchi and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
