Cases 1 - 10 of 33
USA v. George Howell
as 23-1532
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GEORGE L. HOWELL
Bertoldo v. Vectrus, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01399
Plaintiff:
Marta Bertoldo
Defendant:
Vectrus, Inc., Charles Prow, Louis J. Giuliano and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 10 Securities Exchange Act
Coffman v. Vectrus, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03098
Plaintiff:
Catherine Coffman
Defendant:
Vectrus, Inc., Charles Prow, Louis J. Giuliano and others
Harper v. Vectrus, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01146
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Harper
Defendant:
Vectrus, Inc., Charles Prow, Louis J. Giuliano and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Howell v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as ALN/2:20-CV-00993
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., ORTHO- MCNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. nka JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Howell and Audrey L Howell
John Howell v. Donald Grodsky, et al
as 20-30417
Appellee:
CHAFFE MCCALL, L.L.P., SEALE & ROSS, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION and GORDON, ARATA, MCCOLLAM, DUPLANTIS & EAGAN,L.L.C.
Appellant:
JOHN L. HOWELL
Akpeneye v. US
as 20-1622
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM A. CUMMINGS, CHARLES DELUGO, KEVIN TINDAL, SR. and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN ALLEN and SALI ALPHAEK, et al.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Adrienne Howell v. Father Maloney's Boys' Haven, et al
as 20-5122
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADRIENNE L. HOWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
CABINET FOR HEALTH AND FAMILY SERVICES, Commonwealth of Kentucky, ROBERT BROWN LESTER, VICKIE YATES BROWN GLISSON, Individually and in her official capacity as Former Secretary of Cabinet for Health and Family Services and others
John Howell, et al v. Lake Villas Number 2, et al
as 19-30496
Appellee:
SEALE & ROSS, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION, DAVID V. ADLER, LAKE VILLAS NUMBER 2 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED and others
Appellant:
JOHN L. HOWELL and ELISE LAMARTINA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
