Cases 1 - 10 of 33
DiPierro v. New York State Unified Court System
as 24-571
Plaintiff:
PAUL DIPIERRO and MARIE ZWEIG
Defendant:
NEW YORK STATE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM, NEW YORK OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION, JUSTIN BARRY and others
Greater Chautauqua Federal Credit Union v. Quattrone
as 23-733
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Greater Chautauqua Federal Credit Union, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Boulevard Federal Credit Union, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Greater Niagara Federal Credit Union, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Appellant:
Western New York Law Center and Bartel Miller
Defendant:
Hon. Lawrence K. Marks, in his official capacity as Chief Administrative Judge of the Courts and Letitia James, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of New York
Defendant / Appellee:
Sheriff James B. Quattrone, Sheriff John Garcia, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Erie County, New York and Sheriff Michael J. Filicetti, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Niagara County, New York
Greater Chautauqua Federal Credit Union et al v. Marks et al
as 1:2022cv02753
Plaintiff:
Greater Chautauqua Federal Credit Union, Boulevard Federal Credit Union and Greater Niagara Federal Credit Union
Defendant:
Hon. Lawrence K. Marks, James B Quattrone, John C Garcia and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Western New York Law Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cvp Civil Rights (Personal Property)
Chrysafis v. Marks
as 22-3
Plaintiff:
Brandie LaCasse, Housing Court Answers, Make the Road New York and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Pantelis Chrysafis, Mudan Shi, Feng Zhou and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Lawrence K. Marks, in his official capacity as Chief Administrative Judge of the Courts of New York State
Defendant:
Adrian H. Anderson, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Dutchess County, New York, James Dzurenda, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Nassau County, New York, Joseph Fucito, in his official capacity as Sheriff of New York City, New York and others
Cooperative and Condominium Advisory Council (CCAC) et al v. Marks
as 7:2021cv10175
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Seven Pines Associates LP
Plaintiff:
Cooperative and Condominium Advisory Council, Apartment Owners Advisory Council, 35 Clinton Place LLC and others
Defendant:
Lawrence K. Marks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc
Jackson v. Stanford
as 21-2058
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nahshon Jackson
Defendant / Appellee:
Tina M. Stanford, Jeff McKoy and Shelley Mallozzi
Defendant:
Lawrence K. Marks and Jeffery A. Hale
Chrysafis v. Marks
as 21-1493
Defendant / Appellee:
Margaret Garnett, in her official capacity as Commissioner of New York City Department of Investigation, James Dzurenda, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Nassau County, New York, Adrian H. Anderson, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Dutchess County, New York and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Pantelis Chrysafis, Mudan Shi, Feng Zhou and others
Plaintiff:
Make the Road New York
Petitioner:
Housing Court Answers
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 21-1491
Defendant / Appellee:
Jessica Ramos, John Doe 3, Shawn Kerby and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Towaki Komatsu
Defendant:
New York State Office of Court Administration, in their individual and official capacities and John Doe 1
Chrysafis et al v. Marks et al
as 2:2021cv02516
Defendant:
Caroline Tang-Alejandro, Joseph Fucito, Lawrence K. Marks and others
Plaintiff:
Betty S. Cohen, Feng Zhou, Rent Stabilization Association of NYC, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 21-949
Defendant / Appellee:
Janet DiFiore, in her capacity as Chief Judge of the State of New York, NYPD Inspector Howard Redmond, Detective Andrew Berkowitz, Shield No. 7141 and others
Defendant:
Officer Jane Doe 1, Rachel Atcheson, NYPD CAU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Towaki Komatsu
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
