Cases 1 - 10 of 13
UNITED CUTWATER, LLC v. AUTO ENTERPRISE TIG INC. et al
as 3:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
UNITED CUTWATER, LLC
Defendant:
AUTO ENTERPRISE TIG INC., YEVGEN ARUTYUNYAN, OMAR ZHANDARBEKULY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01687
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
LEONARD v. MARINOSCI LAW GROUP, PC
as 1:2016cv00106
Plaintiff:
REBECCA LEONARD
Defendant:
MARINOSCI LAW GROUP, PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MATTESON et al v. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01493
Plaintiff:
JASON BARRIOS, TERESA BAUDOUR, FELICIA BONSER and others
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. and MIDLAND FUNDING LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
HOOSIER ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL et al v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS et al
as 1:2013cv00317
Defendant:
THOMAS P BOSTICK, LUKE T. LEONARD and UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Plaintiff:
CITIZENS FOR APPROPRIATE RURAL ROADS and HOOSIER ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL
Intervenor Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
