Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Talley v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2022cv01712
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, PA Dept. of Corrections, Lt. Jankoviak and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Talley v. Savage et al
as 1:2022cv01713
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Judge Timothy J. Savage, John E. Wetzel, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jackson v. Clear Link Insurance Agency
as 4:2022cv01466
Plaintiff:
Gerard Jackson
Defendant:
Clear Link Insurance Agency
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Smart Communications Holding, Inc. et al v. Global Tel-Link Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv01708
Plaintiff:
Smart Communications Holding, Inc. and HLFIP Holding, Inc. doing business as Smart Communications IP Holdings
Defendant:
Global Tel-Link Corporation, York County, York County Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
POLLARD v. GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION et al
as 2:2018cv03479
Defendant:
GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION and DSI-ITI, LLC
Plaintiff:
GLENN POLLARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
REESE et al v. GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv02197
Plaintiff:
EARL REESE , WALTER CHRUBY , STEPHEN OROSZ, JR. and others
Defendant:
GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
