Other Statutes Cases
Carl Robinson v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 21-2832
Plaintiff / Appellant: CARL ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LYNNE ABRAHAM, MAYOR MICHAEL NUTTER and others
In re: Julio Christian, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-2287
Respondent: CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT 8TH AND RACE, POLICE DEPARTMENT 39TH DISTRICT, CHIEF OF POLICE and others
Petitioner: In re: JULIO CHRISTIAN
Umar Garvin v. Kevin Palmer, et al
as 19-3524
Defendant / Appellee: SUSAN I. SCHULMAN, ROBERT STOCK, Police Officer, and Department, CHARLES RAMSEY, Chief of Police Philadelphia and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: UMAR GARVIN
Defendant: LYNNE ABRAHAM, District Attorney, and Office
Umar Garvin v. Kevin Palmer, et al
as 19-1147
Defendant: LYNNE ABRAHAM, District Attorney and Office, CHARLES RAMSEY, District Attorney and Office, ROBERT STOCK, District Attorney and Office and others
Defendant / Appellee: SUSAN I. SCHULMAN, CHARLES RAMSEY, Chief of Police Philadelphia, ROBERT STOCK, Police Officer and Department and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: UMAR GARVIN
LEWIS v. BLAINE, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2000cv03274
Petitioner: REGINALD S. LEWIS
Respondent: CONNER BLAINE, JR. , THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, LYNN ABRAHAM and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, MICHAEL D. FISHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MUHAMMAD v. FREZGHI et al
as 2:2007cv05553
Plaintiff: WARDA MUHAMMAD
Defendant: HABTE FREZGHI, UNITED STATES POSTAL INSPECTOR, LYNNE ABRAHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CENTER FOR INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM v. CARROLL et al
as 2:2007cv02792
Plaintiff: CENTER FOR INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM
Defendant: JOSEPH W. CARROLL, G. MICHAEL GREEN, LYNNE ABRAHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?