Cases 1 - 10 of 140
Ramirez-Salas De Martinez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2671
Petitioner:
DENIA MERCI RAMIREZ-SALAS DE MARTINEZ, YASMIN CAMILA MARTINEZ-RAMIREZ and LEANDRO OMAR RAMIREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Flores Segura, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2513
Petitioner:
ERIC FRANK FLORES SEGURA, JOHANA ALEXANDRA VIGNOLO ESPINOZA, ARELY MARIANA FLORES VIGNOLO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
v. Naturalization Ceremony 04/23/2024
as 3:2024mc80088
Not Yet Classified:
Adriana Denisse Aguirre, Ali Marzoughi, Jonathan Galvez and others
Castellanos-Murillo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1386
Petitioner:
ELVIN NAHUM CASTELLANOS-MURILLO and LEANDRO CASTELLANOS-FUENTES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Leandro Pulido-Pantoja
as 23-13788
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LEANDRO PULIDO-PANTOJA
Bre v. Aguirre
as 1:2023cv23928
Petitioner:
Paola-Lourdes Bre
Respondent:
Leandro-Sebastian Aguirre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Bre v. Aguirre
as 0:2023cv61953
Petitioner:
Paola-Lourdes Bre
Respondent:
Leandro-Sebastian Aguirre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Bre v. Aguierre
as 0:2023cv61948
Plaintiff:
Ms. Paola-Lourdes Bre
Defendant:
Mr. Leandro-Sebastian Aguierre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
San Leandro Unified School District v. JUUL Labs Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv04472
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Pax Labs, Inc. and Ploom Inc., Altria Group Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
San Leandro Unified School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act
United States of America v. Gonzalez (Landji)
as 23-6696
Defendant:
DAVID CARDONA-CARDONA, ARGEMIRO ZAPATA-CASTRO, SHERVINGTON LOVELL and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JEAN-CLAUDE OKONGO LANDJI and JIBRIL ADAMU
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
