Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
as 1:2016mc00044
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Respondent:
JON WINSTON ACKERSON, GARLAN LEIGH ADAMS, BRADLEY JOHNSTON ADAMSKY and others
GILMAN et al v. WALTERS et al
as 3:2012cv00114
Plaintiff:
DALE P. ARMSTRONG, GEORGE W. BELSEY, CHARLES R. BLAKLEY and others
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES I-X, F.E. MORAN OIL COMPANY, MANNON L. WALTERS LLC and others
Interested Party:
MANNON L. WALTERS 2005 A1, LP, MANNON L. WALTERS 2005 A2, LP, MANNON L. WALTERS 2006A, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GILMAN et al v. WALTERS et al
as 1:2012cv00128
Plaintiff:
DALE P. ARMSTRONG, GEORGE W. BELSEY, CHARLES R. BLAKLEY and others
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES I-X, F.E. MORAN OIL COMPANY, MANNON L. WALTERS LLC and others
Interested Party:
MANNON L. WALTERS 2005 A1, LP, MANNON L. WALTERS 2005 A2, LP, MANNON L. WALTERS 2006A, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01049
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Adkins et al v. Will et al
as 3:2009cv00510
Plaintiff:
Jerry Adkins, Coralie J Anderson, Bill Barber and others
Cause Of Action: Comprehensive Env Response, Compensation & Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
