Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Diamond et al v. Comcast Cable Communications LLC
as 2:2024cv01701
Plaintiff:
H. JOSHUA DIAMOND, ROBERT P. ELSON and LORI ZINN
Defendant:
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC doing business as XFINITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv03166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MONTE et al v. EXCLUSIVE SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01520
Plaintiff:
LORI MONTE and STEVE MONTE
Defendant:
EXCLUSIVE SERVICES, INC., DON FARR, DON FARR MOVING & STORAGE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
O'Connor v. Snyder et al
as 1:2022cv01607
Plaintiff:
Janis O'Connor
Defendant:
Elmer A. Snyder, Lori Snyder, A&L Enterprises, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BELL v. NATIONWIDE JUDGMENT RECOVERY, INC. et al
as 2:2022mc00009
Plaintiff:
KENNETH D. BELL IN HIS CAPACITY AS COURT-APPOINTED RECEIVER FOR REX VENTURE GROUP, LLC doing business as ZEEKREWARDS.COM
Defendant:
TODD DISNER, TRUDY GILMOND, TRUDY GILMOND, LLC and others
Not Classified By Court:
NATIONWIDE JUDGMENT RECOVERY, INC.
BELL v. DISNER et al
as 2:2021mc00091
Plaintiff:
KENNETH D. BELL IN HIS CAPACITY AS COURT-APPOINTED RECEIVER FOR REX VENTURE GROUP, LLC doing business as ZEEKREWARDS.COM
Defendant:
TODD DISNER, TRUDY GILMOND, TRUDY GILMOND, LLC and others
Interested Party:
NATIONWIDE JUDGMENT RECOVERY, INC.
CICCOTELLI v. FIVE PRIME THERAPEUTICS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01512
Defendant:
FRANKLIN ACQUISITION SUB, INC., GARRY NICHOLSON, PEDER K JENSEN and others
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
KELLEY v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv05142
Defendant:
MIDLAND FUNDING LLC and MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Plaintiff:
LORI A. KELLEY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
