Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Charles Allen v. J. Cardenas, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 20-55788
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH M. DIAZ, Acting Secretary for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Secretary of CDCR, J. CARDENAS, Correctional Officer, M. POLLARD, Chief Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD ALLEN
Charles Allen v. J. Cardenas, et al
as 20-55789
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH M. DIAZ, Acting Secretary for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Secretary of CDCR, J. CARDENAS, Correctional Officer, M. POLLARD, Chief Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD ALLEN
Charles Allen v. J. Cardenas, et al
as 19-56419
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH M. DIAZ, Acting Secretary for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Secretary of CDCR, J. CARDENAS, Correctional Officer, M. POLLARD, Chief Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD ALLEN
USA v. Jose Carrillo-Tremillo
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 19-1110
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE M. CARRILLO-TREMILLO, also known as MECHE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael Scott v. Stephen H. Gordon et al
as 2:2017cv08989
Defendant:
Michael L. Allison, Marcos Alvarado, Thomas M. Bowers and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott
Nancy Schwartz v. Opus Bank et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2016cv07991
Defendant:
Nicole M. Carrillo, Stephen H. Gordon and Opus Bank
Plaintiff:
Nancy Schwartz
USA v. Christian Troches-Horellana
as 12-40121
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTIAN NAUN TROCHES-HORELLANA, also known as Elmer M. Carrillo
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.