Cases 1 - 10 of 251
EVERLAST ROOFING, INC. v. WILSON et al
as 2:2024mc00033
Plaintiff:
EVERLAST ROOFING, INC.
Defendant:
MATTHEW WILSON, PEAK QUALITY PRODUCTS, LLC and HIXWOOD METAL LLC
EVERLAST ROOFING, INC. et al v. WILSON et al
as 2:2024mc00034
Plaintiff:
EVERLAST ROOFING, INC.
Defendant:
MATTHEW WILSON, PEAK QUALITY PRODUCTS, LLC and HIXWOOD METAL LLC
Interested Party:
INTERTEK
BFF II PTE. LTD. et al v. ROSEN et al
as 2:2024cv01228
Plaintiff:
BFF II PTE. LTD., SIDE DOOR VENTURES, LP, SDV OPPORTUNITY FUND II and others
Defendant:
MATTHEW ROSEN and BLAIR JESSE REICH
JUMBA BAKER et al v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
COLLEEN JUMBA BAKER, BRITTANY MERCER, MATTHEW O'BRIEN and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH and MATTHEW LACKNER
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Feinberg v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Colin Zwally, Michelle Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Pollick v. Haar et al
as 1:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Cynthia L. Pollick
Defendant:
Matthew M. Haar and Saul Ewing LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
CALLERY et al v. DELOS CAPITAL, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv04784
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CALLERY and TINA FASANO
Defendant:
DELOS CAPITAL, LLC, SHOREVEST CAPITAL, LLC, STEVE ZAMBITO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
KIRKHAM v. TAXACT, INC.
as 2:2023cv03303
Plaintiff:
JAMES KIRKHAM and Matthew Sessoms
Defendant:
TAXACT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Farst v. Autozone, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01435
Plaintiff:
Matthew Farst
Defendant:
Autozone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
