Other Statutes Cases
United Behavioral Health v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco
as 24-242
Petitioner: UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Not Classified By Court: DAVID WIT, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, NATASHA WIT, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, BRIAN MUIR, on his own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Gary Alexander, et al v. United Behavioral Health
as 21-15194
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
Plaintiff / Appellee: GARY ALEXANDER, on his own behalf and on behalf of his beneficiary son, Jordan Alexander, CORINNA KLEIN and DAVID HAFFNER, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Intervenor Plaintiff: MICHAEL DRISCOLL
Amicus Curiae: AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS (AHIP), SECRETARY OF LABOR, NATIONAL HEALTH LAW PROGRAM, et al. and others
Gary Alexander, et al v. United Behavioral Health
as 20-17364
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
Plaintiff / Appellee: GARY ALEXANDER, on his own behalf and on behalf of his beneficiary son, Jordan Alexander, CORINNA KLEIN and DAVID HAFFNER, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Intervenor Plaintiff: MICHAEL DRISCOLL
Milner v. The State of New York
as 19-1342
Defendant: Detective John Flood, individual capacity, Michael Driscoll, Somers New York Police Chief, individual capacity and 2 Unnamed Detectives, individual capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant: John W. Milner
Defendant / Appellee: Governor Andrew M. Cuomo, individual capacity, Attorney General Letitia James, individual capacity and State of New York
DRISCOLL v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00659
Plaintiff: MICHAEL DRISCOLL
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?