Cases 1 - 10 of 23
FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, DISTRTICT OF NEVADA et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, DISTRTICT OF NEVADA and JAMES MICHAEL WELLS
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act
United States of America v. Wells
as 23-3969
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES MICHAEL WELLS
USA v. Michael Wells
as 22-3009
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael Wells
Gonzalez v. Gillis
as 21-60764
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Louis Gonzalez, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, also known as Carlos Ramos Sanchez
Defendant / Appellee:
Warden Shawn R. Gillis, Unit Manager Joseph January, In his individual and official capacity, Unit Counselor Cynthia Pernell, In her individual and official capacities and others
USA v. James Wells
as 21-30121
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES MICHAEL WELLS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Michael Wells
as 20-3019
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael Wells
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
USA v. James Wells
as 20-30009
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES MICHAEL WELLS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Marlon Altamirano, et al v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 19-17099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELMOR JACOB DELEON, MANUEL TEJEDA, JOHNNY O. SANCHEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TANYA ROTHCHILD, Former Chief of the Classification Services Unit, MATTHEW CATE, Former Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, JAMES D. HARTLEY, Warden, Former Warden Avenal State Prison and others
Joyce Keen v. Merck Sharp & Dohme, et al
as 19-1845
Defendant / Appellee:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME, a foreign corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOYCE KEEN
Appellee:
WHEELS, INC. and MICHAEL WELLS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
