Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Woodlands Pride v. Paxton
as 23-20480
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Woodlands Pride, Incorporated, Abilene Pride Alliance, Extragrams, L.L.C. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Warren Kenneth Paxton, In an official capacity as Attorney General of Texas, Brett Ligon, in an official capacity as District Attorney of Montgomery County, Montgomery County, Texas and others
The Woodlands Pride, Inc. et al v. Paxton et al
as 4:2023cv02847
Plaintiff:
The Woodlands Pride, Inc., Abilene Pride Alliance, Extragrams, LLC and others
Defendant:
Angela Colmenero, The Woodlands Township, Brett Ligon and others
Petitioner:
VORTEX Repertory Company, Brock England, Mark Ivy and others
Amicus Curiae:
Texas Values
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spencer v. Abbott
as 21-20336
Defendant / Appellee:
Ronald Chin, Judge Edie Connelly, Amy Blackwelder and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dave Spencer and Faye Spencer
Herridge v. Montgomery County
as 21-20264
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joshua Herridge, individually and in his official capacity as Fire Marshal for Montgomery County, TX and Joshua Herridge
Defendant / Appellee:
Jimmy Williams, Montgomery County, Texas and Jimmy Williams, individually and in his official capacity as Fire Marshal for Montgomery County, TX
Janet Prim, et al v. Stein, et al
as 20-20387
Defendant / Appellee:
Center for the Performing Arts at the Woodlands, Lieutenant Webb, Live Nation Worldwide, Incorporated and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eric Prim and Janet Prim
Dave Spencer, et al v. Robert Wilson, et al
as 20-20140
Defendant / Appellee:
RONALD CHIN, JUDGE EDIE CONNELLY, AMY BLACKWELDER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVE SPENCER and FAYE SPENCER
Herman Hoffman, et al v. Gordon Welch, et al
as 19-20515
Defendant / Appellee:
RONALD CHIN, MICHAEL SEILER, GORDON WELCH, In his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHLEEN HOFFMAN and HERMAN HOFFMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
