Cases 1 - 7 of 7
DOSHI et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv03613
Plaintiff:
TOM DOSHI, XHOVANA DOSHI, BRIANA DOSHI and others
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN and UNITED STATES STATE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
STATEWIDE BONDING, INC et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2018cv02519
Plaintiff:
BIG MARCO INSURANCE AND BONDING SERVICES, LLC, MIKE DONOVAN, STATEWIDE BONDING, INC and others
Defendant:
JODY M. PRESCOTT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
GOODYEAR et al v. SCOTT et al
as 1:2017cv02648
Plaintiff:
GREGORY SCOTT GOODYEAR and LORI JO VALENTI
Defendant:
RICK SCOTT, FRANCIS ROONEY and MARCO RUBIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BELLE v. TEMECULA/RIVERSIDE/SAN DIEGO SUPERIOR COURT COMMISSIONER & PRESIDING JUDGE/JUSTICE COURT LAS VEGAS TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2010cv00726
Plaintiff:
RODNEY BELLE, SR.
Defendant:
TEMECULA/RIVERSIDE/SAN DIEGO SUPERIOR COURT COMMISSIONER & PRESIDING JUDGE/JUSTICE COURT LAS VEGAS TOWNSHIP, ROD PACHECO, JOHN W. VINEYARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
SAMPAIO v. INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK
as 1:2010cv00655
Plaintiff:
MARCO AURELIO ROQUE SAMPAIO
Defendant:
INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELLE v. TEMECULA/RIVERSIDE/SAN DIEGO SUPERIOR COURT/NEVADA TOWNSHIP CPURT & COMMISSIONERS & PRESIDING JUDGES et al
as 1:2010cv00616
Plaintiff:
RODNEY BELLE, SR.
Defendant:
TEMECULA/RIVERSIDE/SAN DIEGO SUPERIOR COURT/NEVADA TOWNSHIP CPURT & COMMISSIONERS & PRESIDING JUDGES, ROD PACHECO, JOHN W. VINEYARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
