Cases 1 - 10 of 11
ARK National Holdings LLC v. WeCampaign LLC et al
as 1:2021cv10893
Defendant:
WeOffers.com, Aram Shirinyan, Titan Digital LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ARK National Holdings LLC
Counter Defendant:
Richard McDonald and Peter McLoughlin
Murray v. Grocery Delivery E-Services USA Inc.
as 1:2019cv12608
Defendant:
Grocery Delivery E-Services USA Inc. DBA Hello Fresh, Grocery Delivery E-Services USA Inc. and Grocery Delivery E-Services USA Inc. doing business as Hello Fresh
Plaintiff:
Grace Murray, Amanda Engen, Stephen Bauer and others
Not Classified By Court:
Kari Hand Benton, Sarah McDonald and Keith Head
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Julian v. McDonald Keohane Funeral Home Inc
as 1:2018cv10113
Plaintiff:
Pamela Julian
Defendant:
McDonald Keohane Funeral Home Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Conservation Law Foundation, Inc. v. R.J. McDonald, Inc.
as 1:2017cv10576
Plaintiff:
Conservation Law Foundation, Inc.
Defendant:
R.J. McDonald, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
United States of America v. McDonald
as 1:2016mc91198
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sandra McDonald
Tsai v. McDonald
as 1:2015cv11676
Plaintiff:
Molly Tsai
Defendant:
Robert A. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Priestley
as 1:2015mc91050
Plaintiff:
Katherine Marie Priestley
Defendant:
McDonald Comrie, Phillip Yee, David Erlanger and others
Erickson v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2011mc91307
Plaintiff:
Heidi K. Erickson
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, AOTC, CPCS and others
Stefanik v. Massachusetts Department of Correction et al
as 3:2010mc30029
Petitioner:
Thomas Stefanik
Respondent:
Massachusetts Department of Correction, Kevin Burke, Joseph D. McDonald and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv11820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
