Cases 1 - 5 of 5
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC et al v. Northland Insurance Company et al
as 1:2020cv24174
Defendant:
Travelers Casualty Company, Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America and others
Plaintiff:
MAO-MSO Recovery II, LLC, Series PMPI, MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC and MSPA Claims 1, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC et al v. Northland Insurance Company et al
as 1:2020cv24176
Defendant:
Travelers Casualty Company, Farmington Casualty Company, Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC, MSPA Claims 1, LLC and MAO-MSO Recovery II, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Pacific Coast Auto Body, Inc. et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 6:2014cv06010
Plaintiff:
Amato's Auto Body, Inc., Campbell's Auto Body, Inc., Pacific Coast Auto Body, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Mercury Insurance Company, United Financial Casualty Company, Wawanesa General Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Kallemeyn Collision Center, Inc. et al v. 21st Century Centennial Insurance Company et al
as 6:2014cv06011
Defendant:
Affirmative Insurance Company, USAA General Indemnity Company, Esurance Property & Casualty Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
S. Danihel Collission, Inc., Knebel Autobody Center, Inc., Kallemeyn Collision Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
A & E Auto Body, Inc. et al v. 21st Century Centennial Insurance Company et al
as 6:2014cv00310
Plaintiff:
Stewart Agency, Inc. doing business as Earl Stewart Toyota of North Palm Beach, Regal Pontiac, Inc., American Paint & Body, Inc. and others
Defendant:
USAA Casualty Insurance Company, First Acceptance Insurance Company, Inc., Security National Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
