Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Appomattox River Water Authority et al v. General Chemical Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv00191
Plaintiff:
Appomattox River Water Authority , County of Chesterfield , County Of Henrico and others
Defendant:
General Chemical Corporation, General Chemical Performance Products, LLC, General Chemical LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fairfax County Water Authority v. General Chemical Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00263
Plaintiff:
Fairfax County Water Authority
Defendant:
General Chemical Corporation, General Chemical Performance, General Chemical LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Fairfax County Water Association v. General Chemical Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00244
Plaintiff:
Fairfax County Water Association
Defendant:
General Chemical Corporation, General Chemical Performance Products, LLC, General Chemical LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Trade-LLC et al
as 1:2010mc00036
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Trade-LLC, Philip W. Milton, William H. Center and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Trade-LLC et al
as 7:2010mc00041
Defendant:
BD LLC, CMJ Capital LLC, William H. Center and others
Receiver:
Jeffrey C. Schneider
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Sonnier v. None Named
as 2:2009cv00404
Plaintiff:
Milton Joseph Sonnier, Jr.
Defendant:
None Named
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medsker et al v. Feingold et al
as 3:2007mc00011
Plaintiff:
Thomas Medsker, Thomas J. Blum, T. H. Holloway and others
Defendant:
David J. Feingold, Darren Silverman, Kristian Baso and others
Movant:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
