Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Doe v. Louisiana Department of Justice et al
as 3:2022cv01419
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Justice, State of Louisiana, City of Baton Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doe v. Louisiana Department of Justice et al
as 3:2022cv01056
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Justice, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt State of Louisiana, City of Baton Organizations Act and Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doe v. Louisiana Department of Justice et al
as 6:2022cv01065
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Justice, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt State of Louisiana, City of Baton Organizations Act and Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Oregon Wild et al v. United States Forest Service et al
as 1:2022cv01007
Plaintiff:
Oregon Wild and WildEarth Guardians
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, Michael Ramsey, Jeannette Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ellis v. Fagan et al
as 3:2022cv00437
Plaintiff:
Kayla Ellis
Defendant:
Shemia Fagan, Joel Christiansen, Aaron Baker and others
Pearson et al v. Porch.com Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00697
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Foulger, Holly Garner, Nichole Lynott and others
Defendant:
Darwin Widjaja, Matthew Ehrlichman, Brenton Marrelli and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Moore v. Account Control Technology Inc.
as 6:2014cv01967
Defendant:
Account Control Technology Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christina Moore
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
