Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Davis et al v. Cate et al
as 2:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Joseph Davis, Jane Fraser, Jackie Magnant and others
Defendant:
Henry Vassa Cate, Village Creek Associates, LLC, Missoe, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
The State of Georgia et al v. Biden et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Plaintiff:
The State of Georgia, The State of Alabama, The State of Idaho and others
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Safer Federal Workforce Task Force, United States Office of Personnel Management and others
Not Yet Classified:
Associated Builders and Contractors of Georgia, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
American Medical Association
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Rubin v. CenterState Bank Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv01629
Defendant:
Jody Dean Dreyer, Ernest S. Pinner, John C. Corbett and others
Plaintiff:
Asher Rubin
Bushansky v. CenterState Bank Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv01597
Defendant:
Jody Dean Dreyer, Ernest S. Pinner, John C. Corbett and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Murray v. FDS Bank
as 1:2019cv00823
Plaintiff:
Polly Murray
Defendant:
FDS Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
MORAN INDUSTRIES INC v. M&L ENTERPRISES GROUP LLC et al
as 3:2018mc00002
Plaintiff:
MORAN INDUSTRIES INC
Defendant:
M&L ENTERPRISES GROUP LLC, MICHAEL L MAY and LYNETTE MURRAY
Colvard v. Thurman
as 1:2017mi00090
Plaintiff:
Murray M. Colvard
Defendant:
Michael Thurman
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
