Cases 1 - 10 of 134
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11434
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Adams v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv10562
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Adams
Defendant:
United States of America, Michigan, State of, Saginaw, County of and others
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al
as 2:2024mc50259
Defendant:
STRATFS, LLC, Strategic Client Support, LLC, Keith Ellison and others
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Letitia James, People of the State of New York and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Farrell et al v. Hillsdale College Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01287
Plaintiff:
Mason Farrell, Tanisha Carter, William Greenberg and others
Defendant:
Hillsdale College Inc., Pop Acta Media LLC, O2M Digital LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Certification of Judgment 21-235 Southern District of New York et al v. Color Express Printing Inc. et al
as 2:2022mc51588
In Re:
Certification of Judgment 21-235 Southern District of New York
Plaintiff:
Keybank National Association
Defendant:
Color Express Printing Inc. and Daniel Payeur
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Fedorova v. Foley et al
as 1:2022cv00991
Defendant:
Covius Document Services, LLC, Nationwide Title Clearing, LLC, William P. Foley, II and others
Plaintiff:
Elena Fedorova
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Groulx v. People's Republic of China et al
as 1:2022cv12295
Plaintiff:
Patrick-Joseph Groulx
Defendant:
People's Republic of China, Bytedance, Toutiao and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
