Cases 1 - 10 of 39
E. Thomas Scarborough, III v. , et alIn re: E. Thomas Scarborough, III v. , et al
as 23-2021
Petitioner:
In re: E. THOMAS SCARBOROUGH, III
Respondent:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA and JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL
E. Scarborough, IIIIn re: E. Scarborough, III
as 23-1284
Petitioner:
In re: E. THOMAS SCARBOROUGH, III
Respondent:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA and JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL
In re: Luis Martinez
as 22-2625
Petitioner:
In re: LUIS NESTOR MARTINEZ
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY NORTHAMPTON COUNTY
Luis Nestor MartinezIn re: Luis Nestor Martinez
as 22-1053
Petitioner:
In re: LUIS NESTOR MARTINEZ
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, DISTRICT ATTORNEY NORTHAMPTON COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Jacob ChristineIn re: Jacob Christine
as 21-3202
Petitioner:
In re: JACOB CHRISTINE
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY NORTHAMPTON COUNTY
Ahmed Gad v. District Attorney Northampton, et al
as 21-3084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AHMED F. GAD
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY NORTHAMPTON COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Shaun Austin v. District Attorney Northampton
as 21-2582
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAUN AUSTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY NORTHAMPTON COUNTY
Rogel Suero v. Superintendent Huntingdon SCI, et al
as 21-2516
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROGEL SUERO
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT HUNTINGDON SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY NORTHAMPTON COUNTY
Ahmed Gad v. District Attorney Northampton, et al
as 21-2421
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AHMED F. GAD
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY NORTHAMPTON COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Lawrence Gaines v. Superintendent Benner Township, et al
as 21-1978
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAWRENCE GAINES
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT BENNER TOWNSHIP SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY NORTHAMPTON COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
