Cases 1 - 10 of 15
HOUCK v. EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 3:2023cv04113
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HOUCK
Defendant:
EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC., JOSEPH MASTRANGELO, RANDALL GONZALE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
HOUCK v. EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv04113
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HOUCK
Defendant:
EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC., JOSEPH MASTRANGELO, RANDALL GONZALE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv20697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
ROWAN v. US DEALER SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2021cv09945
Plaintiff:
NATHAN ROWAN
Defendant:
US DEALER SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
LEWAKOWSKI v. AQUESTIVE THERAPEUTICS, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv03751
Defendant:
KEITH J. KENDALL, JOHN T. MAXWELL, AQUESTIVE THERAPEUTICS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DEANNA LEWAKOWSKI, MATTHEW SMOAK and JAMIE KAKUGAWA
Petitioner:
DANIEL WESSLER and NATHAN BENNETT
Lead Plaintiff:
ARTHUR HAASE
ZALTA v. CITIBANK, INC.
as 3:2018cv08486
Plaintiff:
NATHAN ZALTA
Defendant:
CITIBANK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
PREMIERE MARKETING LLC v. BURROUGHS et al
as 2:2018cv00290
Plaintiff:
PREMIERE MARKETING LLC
Defendant:
NATHAN BURROUGHS , NICHOLAS GEROME , TAURUS ADVISORY GROUP LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv04655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
