Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Fedorova v. Foley et al
as 1:2022cv00991
Defendant:
Covius Document Services, LLC, Nationwide Title Clearing, LLC, William P. Foley, II and others
Plaintiff:
Elena Fedorova
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv13445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv10014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv12881
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Jones v. Dyck-O'Neal, Incorporated et al
as 2:2010cv12412
Plaintiff:
Randall Jones
Defendant:
Dyck-O'Neal, Incorporated, Ally Financial Incorporated, Litton Loan Servicing, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Monroe One Stop LLC et al v. Gold House Century 21 et al
as 5:2009cv10501
Defendant:
Gold House Century 21, National Financial Group, High Bank and Partners and others
Plaintiff:
Monroe One Stop, LLC and D & M Developers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Arslanian v. CTT Partners, LLC, et al
as 2:2009cv10154
Plaintiff:
Paul Arslanian and Paul Arslanian
Defendant:
CTT Partners, LLC, Len R Tosto, Thomas Beer and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hatchett v. National Financial Systems, Inc.
as 2:2008cv13564
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Hatchett
Defendant:
National Financial Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
