Other Statutes Cases filed in California
Cases 1 - 10 of 40
State of Nebraska et al v. Cliff et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01364
Plaintiff: State of Nebraska, State of Alabama, Arizona State Legislature and others
Defendant: Steven S. Cliff and Robert A. Bonta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
People of the State of California v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv05448
Plaintiff: The People of the State of California, People of the State of California, Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Defendant: Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram, LLC, Meta Payments, Inc. and others
Interested Party: Conghua Yan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2021md02981
Defendant: Alphabet Inc., Google Payment Corp., Google Commerce Limited and others
Plaintiff: Jared Stark, Ashly Esquivel, Robert Wing and others
Counter Defendant: Epic Games, Inc., Match Group, LLC and Humor Rainbow, Inc.
Counter Claimant: Google LLC and Google Asia Pacific PTE. Limited
Not Classified By Court: Activision Blizzard, Inc., Niantic, Inc., Big Fish Games and others
Amicus Curiae: American Antitrust Institute and Economists Supporting Dr. Rysman as Proposed Amici
3Rd Party Defendant: Riot Games, Inc.
Interested Party: Valve Corporation, Nintendo of America Inc., Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit and others
Petitioner: Amazon.com LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Commodity Futures Trading Commission et al v. Safeguard Metals LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00691
Defendant: Jeffrey Santulan, Safeguard Metals LLC and Jeffrey Hill
Plaintiff: Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Alabama Securities Commission, Arizona Corporation Commission and others
Petitioner: Utah Division of Securities
Singh v. USCIS et al
as 3:2023cv04410
Plaintiff: Nishan Singh
Defendant: USCIS, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, USCIS Nebraska Service Center and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Bala v. USCIS et al
as 2:2023cv00891
Plaintiff: Manju Bala
Defendant: USCIS, USCIS Nebraska Service Center, Ur M. Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
BALA v. USCIS et al
as 2:2023at00439
Plaintiff: Manju BALA
Defendant: USCIS, USCIS Nebraska Service Center, Ur M. Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Federal Trade Commission v. Meta Platforms Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv04325
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission
Defendant: Meta Platforms Inc.,, Within Unlimited, Inc., Mark Zuckerberg and others
Interested Party: Apple Inc., Alphabet Inc., Nike, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae: State of New York, State of Alaska, State of California and others
Not Classified By Court: ByteDance Inc., Valve Corporation, HTC America, Inc. and others
Petitioner: Forte Nexus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
In re Okta, Inc. Securities Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv02990
Plaintiff: City of Miami Fire Fighters and Police Officers Retirement Trust
Defendant: Okta, Inc., Todd McKinnon, Brett Tighe and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Rachele Byrd
Petitioner: Nebraska Investment Council and Dr. Kathryn M. Flynn
In Re Wells Fargo Collateral Protection Insurance Litigation
as 8:2017ml02797
Defendant: Wells Fargo Auto Insurance Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation, Liaison Counsel for Defendants, NATIONAL GENERAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff: Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs, Gene Conklin, Bryan Tidwell and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Tianna Membreno
Amicus Curiae: Mark Brnovich, Arizona Attorney General, State of Arizona and Attorneys General of Arizona, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Louisiana, Nebraska and Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?