Cases 1 - 10 of 370
FIROOZ et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv09346
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, ROBERT P SANDERS, RENA BITTER and others
Plaintiff:
ABDOLHAMID FIROOZ, MITRA Y ZAVEI and KIMIA FIROUZ
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
PALOMINO MASTER LTD. et al v. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP AG et al
as 2:2024cv05539
Plaintiff:
PALOMINO MASTER LTD., AZTECA PARTNERS LLC and APPALOOSA LP
Defendant:
CREDIT SUISSE GROUP AG, AXEL P. LEHMANN and ULRICH KORNER
DEANGELIS v. HEES et al
as 2:2024cv05687
Plaintiff:
PAULA DEANGELIS
Defendant:
BERNARDO HEES, JAGDEEP PAHWA, ANU HARIHARAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
NAJJAR v. SALAMEH et al
as 1:2024cv05043
Plaintiff:
KARIM P NAJJAR
Defendant:
RIAD SALAMEH, BANQUE DU LIBAN, BANK OF BEIRUT, S.A.L. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
SIMON v. AIRSTREAM, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY P SIMON
Defendant:
AIRSTREAM, INC. and COLONIAL RV D/B/A COLONIAL AIRSTREAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Contract Default
MCGILLVARY v. SCUTARI et al
as 1:2023cv22605
Plaintiff:
CALEB L. MCGILLVARY
Defendant:
NICHOLAS SCUTARI, NETFLIX, THEODORE ROMANKOW and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BURLINGTON DRUG CO., INC. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 3:2012cv02389
Plaintiff:
A.F.L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND, AMERICAN SALES COMPANY INC. and others
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS SERVICE, CVS Caremark Corporation, DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Petitioner:
MATRIX LABORATORIES LIMITED, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and MATRIX LABORATORIES INC.
Special Master:
JOSE L. LINARES
In Re:
LIPITOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court:
FAITH HOCHBERG
Intervenor:
MYLAN INC.
Interested Party:
CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
