Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00043
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00613
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma v. Campbell et al
as 4:2019cv00581
Plaintiff:
Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma
Defendant:
Doerner, Saunders, Daniel & Anderson, L.L.P., John Doe, Stuart D Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00229
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00431
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
3Rd Party Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Caruso Law Firm, P.C. et al v. Mattingly & Roselius, PLLC et al
as 4:2017cv00297
Plaintiff:
Caruso Law Firm, P.C. , Smolen, Smolen & Roytman, PLLC and Law Office of Dale Lipsmeyer
Defendant:
Mattingly & Roselius, PLLC, Kessler, Topaz, Meltzer & Cheek, LLP, Gordon, Caruth & Virden, P.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
