Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Malcolm Schaefer v. John M. McHugh
as 09-5187
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Malcolm G. Schaefer
Defendant - Appellee:
Pete Geren, Secretary of the Army and John M. McHugh, Secretary of the Army
Assn of Civilian Technicians, et al v. USA, et al
as 09-5153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Association of Civilian Technicians, Inc., Laborers' International Union of North America, Daniel Romero Cruz and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Pete Geren, Secretary of the Army, In his official capacity, John M. McHugh, Secretary of the Army, In his official capacity and others
ROBERTSON & PENN V ARMY
as 09-1055
Appellee:
Pete Geren, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
Appellant:
Robertson & Penn, Inc.
Yankton Sioux Tribe v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 08-2255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Yankton Sioux Tribe, and its individual members
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Pete Geren, Secretary of the Army, George S. Dunlop, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works and others
State of Missouri v. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 08-1659
Plaintiff - Appellant:
State of Missouri, ex rel Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Pete Geren, Secretary of the Army, United States Department of Defense and others
CONNER BROS CONSTRUCTION V ARMY
as 08-1188
Appellant:
Conner Brothers Construction Company, Inc.
Appellee:
Pete Geren, Secretary of the Army
ARMY V TECOM
as 08-1171
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and National Defense Industrial Association
Appellant:
Pete Geren, Secretary of the Army
Appellee:
Tecom, Inc.
CAMPBELL V GEREN
as 07-3295
Respondent:
Pete Geren, Secretary of the Army
Petitioner:
William E. Campbell
William E. Campbell:
MUMFORD & MILLER V ARMY
as 07-1471
Appellant:
Mumford & Miller Concrete, Inc.
Appellee:
Pete Geren, Secretary of the Army
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
