Cases 1 - 10 of 11
In Re: WorldCom, Inc. Securities Litigation
as 1:2002cv03288
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Sam P. Seay, State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio, Jere L. Beasley and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Bank of America Securities LLC, Banc of America Securities LLC, Credit Suisse Group and others
Petitioner:
Locals 302 and 612 of the International Union of operating Engineers-Employers Construction Retirement Trust, The National Asbestos Workers Pension Fund, State of Alaska Department of Revenue and others
Plaintiff:
Plumbers & Steamfitters Local 577 Pension Fund, Wayne L. Matthews, George T. Flyny and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Jack Grubman, Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. and Citigroup Global Markets Limited
Claimant:
Paul G. Rochmis, UBS Financial Services Inc., Holly M. Haik and others
Appellant:
Terry Neal, Teresa O. Moxley, Retirement Systems of Alabama and others
Defendant:
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Worldcom, Inc., ABN Amro Incorporated and others
Lead Plaintiff:
New York State Common Retirement Fund, HGK Asset Management, H. Carl McCall and others
Respondent:
Roslyn Berger
Not Classified By Court:
Jane B. Selfe, James J. Savage, Cynthia R. Levin Moulton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
OSTELLA et al v. IRBSEARCH LLC et al
as 4:2014cv00416
Plaintiff:
LISA OSTELLA, LISA LIBERI, BRENT LIBERI and others
Defendant:
IRBSEARCH LLC , DOES 1-50 and SANKEY FIRM INC
In re: Philip J. Berg, Esq.
as 13-80174
Respondent:
In re: PHILIP J. BERG, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit: January 20, 2012
OSTELLA et al v. IRBSEARCH, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv07002
Plaintiff:
LISA OSTELLA , LISA LIBERI , BRENT LIBERI and others
Defendant:
IRBSEARCH, LLC, LEXISNEXIS RISK DATA MANAGEMENT, INC. , NEIL SANKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 2721 Federal Drivers Privacy Protection Act
BERG v. OBAMA et al
as 2:2008cv04083
Plaintiff:
PHILIP J. BERG
Defendant:
BARACK OBAMA, THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Philip Berg v. Barack Obama, et al
as 09-5362
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Philip J. Berg, Esquire, on his Behalf and on Behalf of the Government of the United States of America
Defendant - Appellee:
Barack Hussein Obama and United States of America
John Hemenway v. Barry Soetoro
as 09-5161
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Gregory S. Hollister
Defendant - Appellee:
Barry Soetoro, in his capacity as a natural person; de facto President in posse; and as de jure President in posse, also known as Barack Hussein Obama, Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his capacity as a natural person; as de jure Acting President in posse; as de jure President in posse; as the jure Vice-President in posse and Does 1 through 100, Inclusive, Natural and Un-Natural
Interested Party - Appellant:
John David Hemenway
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Lawrence J Joyce, Esquire and Philip J Berg, Esquire
Gregory Hollister v. Barry Soetoro, et al
as 09-5080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gregory S. Hollister
Defendant - Appellee:
Barry Soetoro, in his capacity as a natural person; de facto President in posse; and as de jure President in posse, also known as Barack Obama, Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his capacity as a natural person; as de jure Acting President in posse; as de jure President in posse; as the jure Vice-President in posse and Does, 1-100 Inclusive, Natural and Un-Natural
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Lawrence J Joyce, Esquire and Philip J Berg, Esquire
BERG v. OBAMA
as 1:2008cv01933
Plaintiff:
PHILIP J. BERG
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, JR.
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
In re: In Re: Paul Andrew Mitchell
as 08-4443
Petitioner:
In re: PAUL ANDREW MITCHELL
Plaintiff - Respondent:
PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE
Defendant - Respondent:
BARACK OBAMA, also known as BARRY SOETORO also known as BARRY OBAMA also known as BARACK DUNHAM also known as BARRY DUNHAM, DEMOCRATIC NATL COMM and FED ELECTION COMM
Nominal Respondent:
R BARCLAY SURRICK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
