Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Das et al v. Lowell Five Cents Savings Bank et al
as 1:2024cv10931
Plaintiff:
Abhijit Das, Mitra Das, Dr Mukti Das and others
Defendant:
Lowell Five Cents Savings Bank, David Wallace, John Pratt, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Quinones et al v. Frequency Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10933
Defendant:
Frequency Therapeutics, Inc., David L. Lucchino and Carl LeBel
Plaintiff:
Paul Evans and Julian Quinones
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Michael Hingston
Interested Party:
Parag Patel and John Pratt
Pratt Surgical Associates, Inc. et al v. Zuchowski et al
as 1:2021cv10532
Defendant:
ACT DIR USCIS Tracy RENAUD, USCIS and Director Laura B. Zuchowski
Plaintiff:
Hassan Aziz, Tufts Medical Center Physicians Organization and Pratt Surgical Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Miller Lifting Products, A Division of GHM Industries, Inc. et al v. Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv10353
Plaintiff:
H.J. Hirtzer & Associates, Inc. and Miller Lifting Products, a Division of GHM Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., ASTM International, Insulatus Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 548 Unfair and Deceptive Trade Acts
Miller Products, A Division of GHM Industries, Inc. et al v. Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv10353
Plaintiff:
Miller Products, A Division of GHM Industries, Inc. and H.J. Hirtzer & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., ASTM International, Hugh Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 548
United States ex rel v. Lenke et al
as 1:2007cv10237
Plaintiff:
United States of America , Bobbie Jean Vaden, Jacqueline Kay Poteet and others
Defendant:
Lawrence G. Lenke , K. Daniel Riew , Regis Haid and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
