Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Isaac Jackson v. Federal Correctional Instituti
as 21-3320
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISAAC P. JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION PEKIN, Staff
Robert Smith v. USA, et al
as 19-1260
Defendant / Appellee:
BEAUMONT FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX, FCI TERRE HAUTE, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION PEKIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT SMITH
Village of Melrose Park et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 1:2018op46312
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Village of River Forest, Village of Tinley Park, City of Chicago Heights and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Village of Melrose Park et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv05753
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, PURDUE PHARMA L.P., MALLINCKRODT LLC and others
Plaintiff:
VILLAGE OF RIVER FOREST, VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK, CITY OF CHICAGO HEIGHTS and others
Village of Melrose Park et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv05288
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Village of River Forest, Village of Tinley Park, City of Chicago Heights and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rahman v. Methodist Health Services Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01290
Defendant:
Proctor Health Care Incorporated, Methodist Health Services Corporation and Pekin Memorial Hospital
Plaintiff:
Dr Saadur Rahman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Pekin Insurance Company v. Cincinnati Insurance Company
as 1:2014cv00861
Plaintiff:
Pekin Insurance Company
Defendant:
Cincinnati Insurance Company
Counter_claimant:
Cincinnati Insurance Company
Counter_defendant:
Pekin Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
DIRECTV, Inc. v. Pekins et al
as 0:2011cv60482
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, Inc.
Defendant:
Teresa Pekins, Ronald E. Pekins, Jr. and Rocam Services Inc.
Mediator:
Alvin Capp
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
