Cases 1 - 5 of 5
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Metro Pain Specialists P.C.
as 22-1386
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and State Farm Fire And Casualty Company
Defendant / Appellee:
Reuven Alon, AKA Rob Alon, Columbus Imaging Center LLC, Medaid Radiology LLC and others
Defendant:
Mohamed Sayed Ahmed Hassan, P.T., Nile Rehab Physical Therapy, P.C., Mohamed Elsayed Khallaf, P.T. and others
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Metro Pain Specialists P.C.
as 22-1318
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and State Farm Fire And Casualty Company
Defendant / Appellant:
Metro Pain Specialists P.C., Leonid Shapiro, M.D., Reuven Alon, AKA Rob Alon and others
Defendant:
Mohamed Sayed Ahmed Hassan, P.T., Nile Rehab Physical Therapy, P.C., Mohamed Elsayed Khallaf, P.T. and others
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al v. Metro Pain Specialists P.C. et al
as 1:2021cv05523
Defendant:
Reuven Alon, Yan Moshe, Hackensack Specialty ASC LLC and others
Plaintiff:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and State Farm Fire And Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Beynin et al
as 1:2019cv06118
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Co., GEICO Casualty Co., GEICO Indemnity Co. and others
Defendant:
Bruce Jacobson, D.C., Joseph Detullio, D.C., Advanced Spinal Care Rehabilitation PA and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Jacobson, D.C. et al
as 1:2015cv07236
Defendant:
Azubuogo Ajudua, M.D. A/K/A Azu Ajudua, M.D., Peter Albis, D.C., BMJ Chiropractic, P.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Geico Casualty Co., Geico General Insurance Company, Geico Indemnity Co and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
