Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Norris v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation et al
as 4:2020cv00543
Defendant:
Raytheon Technologies Corporation, Thomas A Kennedy, Michael J Wood and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Norris
Petitioner:
Heavy & General Laborers' Locals 472 & 172 Annuity Fund, FNY Managed Accounts LLC, Kee Chun Hon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bajjuri v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation et al
as 4:2020cv00468
Defendant:
Raytheon Technologies Corporation, Thomas A Kennedy, Michael J Wood and others
Plaintiff:
Pranay K Bajjuri
In Re: Raytheon Company
as 4:2015mc00003
Respondent:
Johnson Controls, Arizona, State of, Tucson Airport Authority and others
Intervenor Defendant:
University of Arizona and Arizona Board of Regents
In Re:
Raytheon Company
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Barnes v. Raytheon Technical Services Company LLC
as 4:2012cv00839
Plaintiff:
Terrence Barnes
Defendant:
Raytheon Technical Services Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Tucson Airport Authority v. Goforth et al
as 4:2012mc00014
Respondent:
Arizona, State of, Tucson Foundry & Manufacturing Incorporated, Arizona Board of Regents and others
Petitioner:
Tucson Airport Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Capman v. Raytheon Company Long Term Disability Plan et al
as 4:2011cv00204
Plaintiff:
Donna J Capman
Defendant:
Raytheon Company Long Term Disability Plan and Raytheon Company Life Insurance Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Huddleston v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2007at10258
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Huddleston
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Raytheon Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Huddleston v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 4:2007cv00122
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Huddleston and Suzanne Huddleston
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Raytheon Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
