Cases 1 - 10 of 208
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Karr v. Biden Jr et al
as 2:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Donald Richard Karr, Jr
Defendant:
President Joseph R Biden Jr, United States of America, Department of Veterans Affair and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plintron Technologies USA LLC v. Phillips et al
as 2:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plintron Technologies USA LLC
Defendant:
Joseph Phillips, Richard Pelly, Thomas Mathew and others
Madison et al v. Bureau of Indian Affairs
as 2:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Richard Madison and Guy Madison
Defendant:
Bureau of Indian Affairs, Alaska Regional Office and Bureau of Indian Affairs
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05957
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
De La Cruz v. Maurer et al
as 2:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
Roman S De La Cruz
Defendant:
Aimee Maurer, Patrick Johnson, Jeffrey R Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bowman et al v. Unibank et al
as 2:2023cv00971
Plaintiff:
Brodie L Bowman, Jack Bryant, Brian Stephan Chu and others
Defendant:
Unibank, U & I Financial Corp., Simon Bai and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Simpson v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2023cv05545
Plaintiff:
Richard Simpson
Defendant:
State of Washington, Thurston County Prosecutor's Office, Aaron Pruneda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
