Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cohen v. Tepper et al
as 2:2024cv02460
Plaintiff:
Martin Leonard Cohen
Defendant:
Stanley H. Tepper, Alan R. Tepper, Walter A. Koprowski and others
Interested Party:
US Attorney for the E. District of NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud
USA v. Robert Berry
as 20-30189
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT SHERMAN BERRY, AKA Jim Preston
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Robert Berry v. USA
as 12-73818
Petitioner:
ROBERT SHERMAN BERRY, AKA Jim Preston
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Brito (Nazario)
as 12-714
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Hector Hernandez, AKA Anthony, Marlene Brito, Porfirio Gaton and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Ramon Brito, Felix Brito, AKA Eneier Rosario Escalera, AKA Adan, AKA Andre and Andre Nazario
United States of America v. Brito (Felix)
as 12-312
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Hector Hernandez, AKA Anthony, Marlene Brito, Porfirio Gaton and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Felix Brito, AKA Eneier Rosario Escalera, AKA Adan, AKA Andre and Ramon Brito
United States of America v. Brito
as 12-253
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Felix Brito, AKA Eneier Rosario Escalera, AKA Adan, AKA Andre, Hector Hernandez, AKA Anthony, Marlene Brito and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Ramon Brito
Robert Berry v. USA
as 11-72713
Petitioner:
ROBERT SHERMAN BERRY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Robert S. Robinson v. Larry Norris
as 09-2276
Petitioner:
Robert Sherman Robinson
Respondent:
Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections
USA v. Robert Berry
as 08-30102
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT SHERMAN BERRY, Jim Preston
Robert Berry v. USDC-WAE
as 08-71069
:
In re: ROBERT SHERMAN BERRY
Petitioner:
ROBERT SHERMAN BERRY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
